← Back to Templates

Scroll horizontally on smaller screens. Each row covers a theory's main idea, key concepts, and how it differs from related approaches.

Theory Main idea Key concepts Key differences
Extrinsic theory Individuals are driven by external rewards — money, grades, recognition — to engage in certain behaviors. Focuses on external factors: incentives, punishments, social recognition. Behavior is primarily driven by external factors rather than internal desires. In contrast to intrinsic theory, emphasizes the role of external rewards in shaping behavior rather than internal motivation and personal satisfaction.
Attribution theory After an incident, learners unconsciously generate causal explanations (attributions) for the outcomes. Locus indicates whether an individual's problem has an internal or external source. Stability denotes whether the underlying cause is unchanging. Controllability indicates whether the reason is under the person's control. Distinguishes from expectancy-value theory by the premise that emotional mediation of task value drives attributions. Relies on implicit attributions regarding ability consistency.
Expectancy theory Learners are motivated when they believe their efforts will lead to desired performance and outcomes. Three components: expectancy (effort → performance), instrumentality (performance → outcomes), and valence (the value assigned to desired outcomes). Distinct from other theories in its focus on cognitive processes underlying motivation and the belief in the link between effort, performance, and outcomes.
Intrinsic theory Internal factors — personal interests, enjoyment, inherent satisfaction — play a significant role in driving human behavior. Emphasizes intrinsic rewards: accomplishment, enjoyment, personal growth. Individuals have an innate drive to pursue activities that align with their interests. Stands in contrast to extrinsic theory by highlighting the role of internal factors and personal satisfaction rather than external rewards.
Expectancy-value theory Motivation is influenced by expectations of achievement and perceived worth. Success expectation is confidence that one will achieve their goal with effort. A person's job value is determined by how much they value or enjoy performing the activity. Several other theories also make use of ideas like an expectancy of success and value, but this theory places both equally at the center.
ARCS model of motivation Focuses on designing instructional materials and strategies to enhance learner motivation. Captures learners' Attention, demonstrates Relevance, builds Confidence in their ability to succeed, and provides a sense of Satisfaction or accomplishment. Complements other motivation theories by providing practical guidelines for instructional design, taking into account specific motivational factors that enhance engagement.
Self-determination theory (SDT) Encompasses both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations contextualized by three factors: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Autonomy is the freedom to make one's own decisions. Competence describes apparent skill and success. Relatedness is a feeling of connection with others. Extrinsic values can become internalized and self-determined. Distinguished from other theories by its focus on autonomy, choice, and human relationships as the core drivers of sustained motivation.
Social cognitive theory (SCT) Personal characteristics, behavioral tendencies, and external context all interact to influence an individual's ability to learn and perform. Self-efficacy is the main source of motivation and a personal assessment of one's capacity for learning at a certain level. Outcome expectation and self-regulation are also central. Though it shares similarities with other constructs of expectancy, self-efficacy tends to be more task-, context-, and goal-oriented than general expectancy beliefs.
Goal-orientation theory Learners often look at activities with three main objectives: mastery, outperforming peers, and preventing failure. Mastery orientation stems from a "growth learning mindset." Performance orientation emphasizes seeming intelligent. Performance-avoidance focuses on preventing failure. Contrary to attribution theory, controllability beliefs differ from person to person — they are not a constant attribute of the event or learner.
← Back to Templates